June 7, 2007

Brown tide must be studied as ecosystem failure

Asbury Park Press, 6/7/2007
Brown tide must be studied as ecosystem failure

There is a coastal mayor named Larry Vaughn whose name you probably won’t remember, but you will remember his message. He is the fictional character in the movie “Jaws,” the one who declares that the movie’s tourist-dependent beaches will not be closed on July 4th weekend. We all know what happens next.

Just before the Memorial Day weekend and with little scientific basis, state officials made the prediction that “water quality is expected to be good this summer.” On Memorial Day weekend, a brown algae bloom appeared and stretched from Sandy Hook to Avon, eventually reaching Manasquan after the weekend.

Our coalition of 10 environmental groups pointed out that brown tide is an indicator of poor ecosystem health. Furthermore, we were surprised by the state’s reaction that these algae blooms are normal. State Environmental Protection Commissioner Lisa Jackson then admonished the Coastal Ocean Coalition and paid homage to Mayor Vaughn by saying, “It’s just unsettling that they would choose to sensationalize the algae bloom . . . at the start of the beach season.” She then suggested the coalition has an agenda.

We certainly do have an agenda, and we have been bringing it to the Statehouse and the Legislature for almost two years now. It is called ecosystem-based management. It is one of the major recommendations of both the Pew Oceans Commission and the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy.

Ecosystem-based management looks at all the links among living and nonliving resources, rather than considering single issues in isolation. Instead of developing a management plan for one issue, it focuses on the multiple activities occurring within specific areas that are defined by ecosystem, rather than political, boundaries.

Ecosystem-based management would move environmental protection away from the practice of managing species by species and using single parameters to determine environmental health. The current system puts environmental programs into “silos,” isolated from all other programs. This is not the way the natural world works. As the grandfather of the environmental movement, John Muir, said, “Tug on anything at all and you’ll find it connected to everything else in the universe.”

Sen. Ellen Karcher, D-Monmouth, is sponsoring a bill, S-2645, that would encourage the state to use ecosystem-based management. It has already been discussed by the Senate Environment Committee. Other states such as New York and California have adopted this approach to managing their coastal resources. It is up to our Legislature to bring this policy to New Jersey, and it is up to the governor to sign it into law. Once enacted, our preparation for and our response to an event like an algae bloom would be much different.

This recent bloom is most likely a sign of an abnormal nutrient load somewhere in the watershed. It illustrates the limitations of the current monitoring system. We are not suggesting that this particular type of algae bloom is harmful to human health. At its worst, it is aesthetically repulsive. But it is potentially harmful to shellfish, bottom-dwelling finfish and marine plants, and that is where the single parameter monitoring system fails.

It is possible that a severe algae bloom like this could send all the tourists and beachgoers packing for other shores, yet the state’s test for one type of harmful bacteria, enterococcus, would declare our water quality good. Ecosystem-based management would recognize that tourists are not the only species residing at the shore. It would employ parameters that actually measure biological conditions along the coast, not surrogate indicators like dissolved oxygen or single purpose parameters like enterocci bacteria. The result would be a more complete picture of coastal health. This would be good for both the tourist economy and the coastal ecosystem.

We would like to bury the spirit of Mayor Vaughn and use an event like an algae bloom to have a frank discussion about the health of our coasts and oceans – even if it is tourist season. But more importantly, with a policy of ecosystem-based management, we would be assured we have the best policy in place to prevent it and deal with it.

John Weber is the Northeast regional manager for the Surfrider Foundation, a member of the Coastal Ocean Coalition.
Original story link

April 27, 2007

Sea Bright club OKs access

Asbury Park Press, 4/27/2007
Sea Bright club OKs access

FREEHOLD – Donovan’s Reef Beach Club, one of nine defendants in a beach-access lawsuit, reached a settlement Thursday with the state Attorney General’s Office to allow the public unrestricted access to and use of its Sea Bright beach.

According to Stefanie A. Brand, assistant attorney general in charge of litigation, Donovan’s Reef may charge a “reasonable fee,” in the access agreement.

Peter Yasenchak, attorney for Donovan’s Reef, said the club already provides unlimited access to the public at a cost of $5 per day.

“They never restricted access in the way some of the other beach clubs do,” Yasenchak said.

After further discussion Thursday in state Superior Court Judge Alexander D. Lehrer’s courtroom, the lawsuit moved into the discovery phase.

In the suit, filed in September, the state argues that because private beaches in Sea Bright have been improved by a publicly funded $29 million beach-replenishment project, the general public should have access to them.

According to the suit, the Army Corps of Engineers replenished the borough’s beaches in 1995 and in 2003, turning them from “a narrow strip” to “approximately 250 feet” from the water line.

After discussion, Lehrer granted a request by Paul Schneider, the attorney representing the Chapel and Driftwood beach clubs, to allow the defendants to amend their pleas in the case.

Thomas Hirsch, the attorney for the Surf Rider Beach Club, said this means defendants are now allowed to file countersuits.

Lehrer also gave attorneys a 120-day discovery period, during which time, Hirsch said, lawyers would be able to ask questions and take depositions “to try to get a better understanding of the state’s factual allegations in their complaint.”

The judge, however, told the attorneys on both sides that he was not ruling out the possibility of a settlement, saying that if during the discovery period “you do want a settlement conference, I’m available any time day or night.”

Brand said Thursday it was “unclear” what the move into the discovery phase will mean for the case.

“Discussions will continue, but we’re moving the case forward, which is fine,” she said. “We filed the case, we’re ready to litigate it.”

Lehrer said both sides will be returning to court before the 120-day discovery period is finished, and there will be another conference after the defendants amend their pleas. He also remained hopeful that the situation could be settled through discussions and negotiation.

“(Both sides’) positions are different, but they are not so far apart that a settlement can’t be reached,” he said.

On Jan. 29, Lehrer ordered the state to provide club owners with a detailed description of the expanded beach access being sought by the suit.

On March 13, Brand said the state would like to see unrestricted public access on any area of beach containing sand put there by the replenishment project.


©2007 Asbury Park Press
Original story link

1 58 59 60